Making Sense of Physical Indicators – Queensland
Some indicators of the physical quality of soil measure dynamic soil properties i.e. properties that are changed over time and with management. It is important to monitor these indicators as they can act as constraints to yield, restricting crop growth and preventing the yield potential from being achieved.
- Indicators falling in the RED zone are high risk and need to be investigated urgently.
- Indicators falling in the AMBER zone are moderate risk and should be investigated further.
- Indicators falling in the GREEN zone are low risk, regular monitoring should be continued.
Bulk density is an indicator of the packing density of the soil measured in grams per cubic centimetre (g per cm3). It indicates soil porosity, but it does not give any indication of the size or continuity of the pores. Bulk density values are affected by soil texture but are not easily correlated with soil types. Sand soils may be particularly prone to compaction.
Subsurface compactionBulk density tends to increase with depth and high values below 40 cm are usually an inherent characteristic of the soil. However, compaction closer to the surface may indicate layers that form as a result of compaction by machinery (commonly at 10–40 cm) (figure 1) and livestock (commonly at 0–15 cm). Other indicators of a compacted layer are poor root growth, roots growing horizontally and thickened root tips. A cone penetrometer can be used to measure the force required to penetrate the soil in mega Pascals (MPa).
It is important to note that some soils may be inherently hard. This includes soils that are naturally hardsetting due to packing or transient bonding and soils that have hard pans due to cemented layers resulting from chemical precipitation.
Figure 1: (a) A dense compacted layer in yellow loamy sand at 15–30 cm (Photo by Noel Schocknecht, DAFWA). (b) A distinct compacted layer in a sandy loam, note fractures in hard pan through which roots preferentially grow.
Water holding capacity
Water availability is strongly related to soil texture which largely controls the number and size of pores in the soil. However, for each field texture grade soil structure also affects water availability and the values of the lower and upper storage limits. Soil structure can be assessed descriptively in the field but it is difficult to measure objectively. Structural improvement in clay soils will create more macropores and increase the effectiveness of natural drainage when the soil is wet and reduce the upper storage limit. In contrast, structural improvements in sand create more micropores which are able to hold onto water as the soil dries.
Many indicators of the physical quality of soil measure inherent characteristics of the soil, which means they are largely outside a farmer’s control. These are derived largely from the parent material of the soil and change very little over time or as a result of management. These properties can be measured once and used to group sites that are likely to respond in similar ways to management e.g. sand soils; seasonally waterlogged soils.
Soil texture is a key foundational property of the soil which affects the movement of air, water and nutrients in the soil. The Measuring Soil Texture in the Field fact sheet gives details of how soils can be allocated to one of the 15 texture grades (loam, silty clay etc) in the field. The Measuring Soil Texture in the Laboratory fact sheet shows how the % sand, silt and clay can also be converted using the texture triangle. To simplify the interpretation of the other indicators of soil quality, within soilquality.org.au, soil texture classes are grouped together into sand, loam and clay soils (figure 1).
Figure 1: Grouping of textural classes to simpler groups of clay (blue), loam (green) and sand (gold) superimposed on the full textural triangle showing the definition of soil texture classes based on % sand, silt and clay.
The National Soil Quality Monitoring Program is being funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation, as part of the second Soil Biology Initiative.
The participating organisations accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it.