Soil texture is an estimate of the relative amounts of sand, silt and clay particles in a soil. The physical and chemical behaviour of a soil is influenced strongly by soil texture (Bowman & Hutka, 2002), which will vary due to the differences in the type and mineral composition of the parent material, the soils position in the landscape, and the physical and chemical weathering processes involved in soil formation. Soil texture affects the movement and availability of air, nutrients and water in a soil (Hunt and Gilkes, 1992) and is often used to estimate other soil properties, particularly soil water properties, if no direct measurements are available (NLWRA, 2001). A simple measure of soil texture is the way a soil feels when manipulated by hand.
Field or hand texturing is a measure of the behaviour of a small handful of soil when moistened and kneaded into a ball slightly larger than the size of a golf ball (NSW Agriculture, 1988) or bolus and pressed out to form a ribbon between the thumb and forefinger (figure 1). The behaviour of the soil during bolus formation, and the ribbon produced, characterises the field texture.
Take a sample of soil and remove the > 2 mm fraction (gravel — see below, roots, organic material) by sieving or by hand. The sample should be sufficient to fit comfortably into the palm of your hand. Moisten the soil with a little water and knead it into a bolus (figure 1). Continue to work the bolus, adding more soil and water if necessary, until the soil no longer sticks to your fingers and there is no apparent change in plasticity (usually 1 – 2 minutes). If the bolus is worked for a long time it may dry but it can be rewet (the moisture of the sample will influence the length of the ribbon formed).
Using a clean, moistened hand, place the bolus between your thumb and forefinger and slide your thumb across the soil (shearing) to extrude a ribbon. Try to make a thin continuous ribbon about 2 mm thick and 1 cm wide. Measure and record the length of the ribbon produced using a rule. Soils with high clay content are further categorised by moulding the bolus into rods. If the rods fracture the soil is assigned a texture grade lighter than a medium clay. A breakdown of field texturing categories is given in table 1. This method has been adapted from McDonald et al., (1998).
Gravel (particles > 2 mm) is removed from the soil prior to texturing because it does not contribute to chemical and some physical properties of soils.
A laboratory determination of soil texture gives a more detailed and reliable measure of the relative amounts of sand, silt and clay particles in a soil. The common term for measuring soil texture in the laboratory is particle size analysis (PSA). Particle size analysis determines particle size distribution (PSD) of a soil and while field texture is closely related to the PSD (McKenzie et al., 2004), texture classes assigned from field texture and PSA are not always equivalent. For example, sodic soils have a heavier field texture than is suggested by the laboratory determined PSA. For a more detailed description of this method please refer to Particle Size Analysis in the Soil Texture fact sheet.
Figure 1: Manipulation of soil for field texturing. The properties of each soil when doing this determines texture.
Table 1: Classification based on field texturing of soils. The combination of ‘Behaviour of Moist Bolus’ and ‘Ribbon Length’ gives an indication of ‘Field Texture Grade’. Adapted from McDonald et al. (1998).
Field Texture Grade
Behaviour of Moist Bolus
Ribbon Length (shearing between thumb and forefinger)
Approximate Clay Content (%)
Coherence nil to very slight, cannot be moulded; single sand grains adhere to fingers.
<10% (often <5%)
approx. 5 mm
Slight coherence, sticky when wet; many sand grains stick to fingers; clay stains the hands.
Bolus just coherent but very sandy to touch; dominant sand grains are of medium size and are easily visible.
Bolus coherent and rather spongy; smooth feel when manipulated, no obvious sandiness or ?silkiness?; may be greasy to the touch if much organic matter is present.
approx. 25 mm
Coherent bolus; very smooth to silky when manipulated.
approx. 25 mm
approx. 25% (with silt)
Sand Clay Loam
Strongly coherent bolus, sandy to touch; medium size sand grains visible in finer matrix.
Coherent plastic bolus, smooth to manipulate.
Clay Loam, Sandy
Coherent plastic bolus; medium size sand grains visible in finer matrix.
Silty Clay Loam
Coherent smooth bolus; plastic and often silky to the touch.
30-35% (with silt)
Plastic bolus; fine to medium sand grains can be seen, felt or heard in clayey matrix.
Plastic bolus; smooth to touch.
50-75 mm (slight resistance to ribbon shear)
Light Medium Clay
Plastic bolus; smooth to touch.
approx. 75 mm (mod. resistance to ribbon shear)
Smooth plastic bolus; handles like plasticine; can be moulded into rods without fracture.
>75 mm (mod. resistance to ribbon shear )
Smooth plastic bolus; handles like stiff plasticine; can be moulded into rods without fracture.
>75 mm (firm resistance to ribbon shear )
Bolus: the ball of soil formed by manipulating the soil by hand.
Coherence: the ball or bolus of soil holds together.
Parent material: weathered and unweathered rock or soil from which soil is formed.
Plasticity: the ball can be deformed and holds its new shape strongly; typical of clays.
Shearing: sliding the thumb across the soil to form a ribbon.
Silkiness: the smooth, soapy or slippery feel of silt.
Sodic: soils with a high level of exchangeable sodium (can lead to poor soil physical conditions).
Bowman GM, Hutka J (2002) Particle Size Analysis. In Soil Physical Measurement and Interpretation For Land Evaluation.
(Eds. NJ McKenzie, HP Cresswell, KJ Coughlan) pp 224-239. (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Victoria).
Hunt N, Gilkes R (1992) Farm Monitoring Handbook. (The University of Western Australia: Nedlands, WA).
McDonald RC, Isbell RF, Speight JG, Walker J, Hopkins MS (1998) Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook. (Australian Collaborative Land Evaluation Program: Canberra).
McKenzie NJ, Jacquier DJ, Isbell RF, Brown KL (2004) Australian Soils and Landscapes An Illustrated Compendium. CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Victoria.
NLWRA (2001) Australian Agricultural Assessment 2001. National Land and Water Resources Audit.
NSW Agriculture (1998) SOILpakTM For dryland farmers on the red soil of Central Western NSW (Eds. A Anderson, D McKenzie, J Friend) (NSW Agriculture).
Authors: Katharine Brown (The University of Western Australia)
This soilquality.org.au fact-sheet has been funded by the Healthy Soils for Sustainable Farms programme, an initiative of the Australian Government’s Natural Heritage Trust in partnership with the GRDC, and the WA NRM regions of Avon Catchment Council and South Coast NRM, through National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality and National Landcare Programme investments of the WA and Australian Governments.
The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Agriculture and Food, The State of Western Australia and The University of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it.